Lucretius I, An Ontology of Motion

Thomas Nail argues convincingly and systematically that Lucretius was not an atomist, but a thinker of kinetic flux. In doing so, he completely overthrows the interpretive foundations of modern scientific materialism, whose philosophical origins lie in the atomic reading of Lucretius’ immensely influential book De Rerum Natura.

This means that Lucretius was not the revolutionary harbinger of modern science as Greenblatt and others have argued; he was its greatest victim. Nail re-reads De Rerum Natura to offer us a new Lucretius – a Lucretius for today.
Download

Lucretius I_An Ontology of Motion.pdf
Lucretius I_An Ontology of Motion.txt

RULES OF CONDUCT

Full text versions may only be printed out or saved for personal use or for research purposes.
Articles and other electronic resources may not be passed on to third parties or used commercially, in either electronic or printed form.

Downloaded material must be deleted by completion of the course.
The use of electronic documents is regulated in license terms.